Saturday, July 10, 2010
Homeopathy medicine Arsenicum album effective against flu
Friday, April 30, 2010
Battle of Homeopathy
Homeopathy works for babies and even pets. Certainly, intellect and patient belief system are not in play here. Homeopathy became popular in the United States and Europe in the 1800s.
The strongest advocates were European royalty, American entrepreneurs, literary giants, and religious leaders. As it gained widespread popularity, it became the object of animosity and opposition from mainstream medicine.
The conflict between homeopathy and orthodox medicine was protracted and bitter.
The battle goes on
We know who won the first round of this conflict. The results of the second round is left to be seen.
Hopefully, we will soon discover that a "fight" over healing is inappropriate and that various approaches to healing are necessary to build a comprehensive and effective healthcare system.
The history of homeopathy begins with the discoveries of its founder, Samuel Hahnemann (1755-1843), a German physician disillusioned with the medical practice of the time. He first coined the word "homeopathy".
"Homoios" in Greek means similar. "Pathos" means suffering. This refers to the pharmacological principle, the law of similars, that is its basis.
The law of similars was previously described by Hippocrates (the Father of Medicine) and Paracelsus, and was utilised by many cultures, including the Mayans, Chinese, Greeks, Native American Indians and Indians.
But it was Hahnemann who codified the law of similars into a systematic medical science. His first comments about the applicability of the law of similars were in 1789, when he translated a book by William Cullen - leading physicians of the era.
At one point in the book, Cullen ascribed the usefulness of Peruvian bark (Cinchona) in treating malaria due to its bitter and astringent properties.
Similars
Hahnemann wrote a bold footnote in his translation, disputing Cullen's explanation. He asserted that the efficacy of Peruvian bark must be for other factor.
He noted that there were other substances and mixtures of substances decidedly more bitter and astringent than Peruvian bark that were not effective in treating malaria.
He described himself taking repeated doses of this herb until his body responded to its toxic dose with fever, chills and other symptoms similar to malaria.
Hahnemann concluded that this herb was beneficial because it caused symptoms similar to those of the disease it was treating. That was a mind blowing and paradigm changing idea that day! Hahnemann was clearly a brilliant mind.
He was translating Cullen's work, which indicates that he was one of the more respected translators of his day. When he was only 24, Hahnemann could read and write in at least seven languages.
He ultimately translated over 20 major medical and scientific texts. This story reveals Hahnemann as both an avid experimenter and a respected chemist.
He had authored a four-volume set of books called The Pharmaceutical Lexicon, which was considered one of the standard reference texts for apothecaries or pharmacists.
Rebel
Hahnemann was an audacious rebel. He was unafraid to speak his mind, even if it meant correcting the analysis of a very respected physician.
He was unafraid to question commonly accepted truths. After translating Cullen's work, Hahnemann spent the next six years actively experimenting on himself, his family and a small but growing group of followers.
In 1796, he wrote about his experiences with the law of similars in Hufeland's Journal, a respected medical journal in Germany.
Coincidentally, in 1798, Edward Jenner discovered the value of giving small doses of cowpox to people in an effort to immunise them against smallpox. While Jenner's work was generally accepted into orthodox medicine, Hahnemann's was not. Hahnemann was particularly disliked by the apothecaries because he recommended the use of only one medicine at a time and prescribing limited doses of it.
As he recommended only small doses of each medicine, the apothecaries could not charge much for them. And because each medicine required careful preparation, Hahnemann found that the apothecaries were not always making them correctly or were intentionally giving his patients different medicines.
As he grew to distrust the apothecaries, he chose to dispense his medicines, an illegal act at the time in Germany. The apothecaries then accused Hahnemann of "entrenching upon their privileges by the dispensing of medicines".
He was arrested in Leipzig in 1820, found guilty and forced to move.
Prosecuted
He moved to Kothen, where he was delegated special permission to practice and dispense his medicines by Grand Duke Ferdinand, one of the many European royalties who supported homeopathy.
Despite the persecution, homeopathy continued to grow, not just because it offered a systematic approach to treating sick people, but also because orthodox medicine was ineffective and dangerous in some instances, especially for chronic diseases.
Indeed, there is general agreement among medical historians today that orthodox medicine of the 1700s and 1800s in particular frequently caused more harm than good. Besides bloodletting and leeches, orthodox physicians used medicines made from mercury, lead, arsenic and various strong herbs to help purge the body of foreign disease-causing matter.
Despite the fact that historians and scientists today consider medicine of the 18th and 19th Century as unscientific and barbaric, orthodox physicians had the audacity to call homeopathy "quackery", "unscientific", "cultish", and "devilish".
Homeopathy lost out with the masses. But it remained popular with the elite as it was effective, safe and did not cost much.
Indeed, the great Mahatma Ghandi, while studying law in the UK, noticed homeopathy was "safe, cheap and effective" and brought it back for the masses in India. Wide range Homeopaths treat a veritable array of problems.
These include allergies, anorectal disorders, asthma, arthritis, back pain, neuralgia, colic, coughs and colds, cystitis, depression, eczema, gynaecological problems, hair loss, heartburn, hyper-pigmentation, insect bites, insomnia, irritable bowel syndrome, leg cramp, menopausal problems, migraines, morning sickness, nausea, obesity, phobias, pre-menstrual syndrome, sexual disorders, stress, teething pains, tumours and warts.
Most homeopaths regularly treat chronic or recurrent conditions such as eczema, rheumatoid arthritis, fatigue disorders, asthma, migraine, dysmenorrhoea, irritable bowel syndrome, recurrent upper respiratory or urinary tract infections and mood disorders. Patients with ill-defined illness that defy conventional diagnosis are also treated.
Significantly, homeopaths treat children more often than other complementary practitioners.
Homeopathy is most popular in the UK, where the Royal Family has had homeopathic physicians since the 1830s. In England, as many as 45 per cent of conventional doctors (MDs) refer patients to homeopaths.
The treatment is part of the National Health Scheme (NHS). This is of course, highly unscientific and anecdotal in nature. But the Queen Mother lived to 100 and wherever she went, she took her homeopathy kit. And she walked upright although she had arthritis.
Source:asiaonehealth
Monday, April 19, 2010
The homeopathy alternative
2010/04/19
Rajem M.
In England, as many as 45 per cent of conventional doctors refer patients to homeopaths
LAST week, I talked about my moment of “epiphany” that resulted in me turning dramatically to the world of natural medicine.
I realised quickly that much of the world used natural medicine most of the time.
So did our grandmothers and their grandmothers.
But homeopathy itself stood very uncomfortably as it was seen as “nothing” in sugar globules.
Indeed, in a 1997 letter to the editor of The Lancet, titled Homeopathy — Much Ado About Nothing?, Nasir Ali Asfar of the Department of Pharmacology, Zainudduin Medical College in Karachi, bluntly suggested that it was placebo and based on superstition. Placebo Sure, it is based on “energy medicine”.
| The Queen Mother took her homeopathy kit wherever she went. She lived to 100 |
There is sometimes nothing left of the “active substance” of numerous dilutions.
So the claim of placebo comes to mind as it may be seen playing on the patient’s mind and belief systems.
There is a problem with this argument.
Homeopathy works for babies and even pets.
Certainly, intellect and patient belief system are not in play here.
Homeopathy became popular in the United States and Europe in the 1800s.
The strongest advocates were European royalty, American entrepreneurs, literary giants, and religious leaders. As it gained widespread popularity, it became the object of animosity and opposition from mainstream medicine.
The conflict between homeopathy and orthodox medicine was protracted and bitter.
The battle goes on We know who won the first round of this conflict.
The results of the second round is left to be seen.
Hopefully, we will soon discover that a “fight” over healing is inappropriate and that various approaches to healing are necessary to build a comprehensive and effective healthcare system.
The history of homeopathy begins with the discoveries of its founder, Samuel Hahnemann (1755-1843), a German physician disillusioned with the medical practice of the time.
He first coined the word “homeopathy”.
“Homoios” in Greek means similar.
“Pathos” means suffering.
This refers to the pharmacological principle, the law of similars, that is its basis.
The law of similars was previously described by Hippocrates (the Father of Medicine) and Paracelsus, and was utilised by many cultures, including the Mayans, Chinese, Greeks, Native American Indians and Indians.
But it was Hahnemann who codified the law of similars into a systematic medical science.
His first comments about the applicability of the law of similars were in 1789, when he translated a book by William Cullen — leading physicians of the era.
At one point in the book, Cullen ascribed the usefulness of Peruvian bark (Cinchona) in treating malaria due to its bitter and astringent properties.
Similars Hahnemann wrote a bold footnote in his translation, disputing Cullen’s explanation.
He asserted that the efficacy of Peruvian bark must be for other factor.
He noted that there were other substances and mixtures of substances decidedly more bitter and astringent than Peruvian bark that were not effective in treating malaria.
He described himself taking repeated doses of this herb until his body responded to its toxic dose with fever, chills and other symptoms similar to malaria.
Hahnemann concluded that this herb was beneficial because it caused symptoms similar to those of the disease it was treating.
That was a mind blowing and paradigm changing idea that day! Hahnemann was clearly a brilliant mind.
He was translating Cullen’s work, which indicates that he was one of the more respected translators of his day.
When he was only 24, Hahnemann could read and write in at least seven languages.
He ultimately translated over 20 major medical and scientific texts.
This story reveals Hahnemann as both an avid experimenter and a respected chemist.
He had authored a four-volume set of books called The Pharmaceutical Lexicon, which was considered one of the standard reference texts for apothecaries or pharmacists.
Rebel Hahnemann was an audacious rebel.
He was unafraid to speak his mind, even if it meant correcting the analysis of a very respected physician.
He was unafraid to question commonly accepted truths. After translating Cullen’s work, Hahnemann spent the next six years actively experimenting on himself, his family and a small but growing group of followers.
In 1796, he wrote about his experiences with the law of similars in Hufeland’s Journal, a respected medical journal in Germany.
Coincidentally, in 1798, Edward Jenner discovered the value of giving small doses of cowpox to people in an effort to immunise them against smallpox. While Jenner’s work was generally accepted into orthodox medicine, Hahnemann’s was not. Hahnemann was particularly disliked by the apothecaries because he recommended the use of only one medicine at a time and prescribing limited doses of it.
As he recommended only small doses of each medicine, the apothecaries could not charge much for them.
And because each medicine required careful preparation, Hahnemann found that the apothecaries were not always making them correctly or were intentionally giving his patients different medicines.
As he grew to distrust the apothecaries, he chose to dispense his medicines, an illegal act at the time in Germany.
The apothecaries then accused Hahnemann of “entrenching upon their privileges by the dispensing of medicines”.
He was arrested in Leipzig in 1820, found guilty and forced to move.
Prosecuted He moved to Kothen, where he was delegated special permission to practice and dispense his medicines by Grand Duke Ferdinand, one of the many European royalties who supported homeopathy. Despite the persecution, homeopathy continued to grow, not just because it offered a systematic approach to treating sick people, but also because orthodox medicine was ineffective and dangerous in some instances, especially for chronic diseases.
Indeed, there is general agreement among medical historians today that orthodox medicine of the 1700s and 1800s in particular frequently caused more harm than good.
Besides bloodletting and leeches, orthodox physicians used medicines made from mercury, lead, arsenic and various strong herbs to help purge the body of foreign disease-causing matter.
Despite the fact that historians and scientists today consider medicine of the 18th and 19th Century as unscientific and barbaric, orthodox physicians had the audacity to call homeopathy “quackery”, “unscientific”, “cultish”, and “devilish”.
Homeopathy lost out with the masses.
But it remained popular with the elite as it was effective, safe and did not cost much.
Indeed, the great Mahatma Ghandi, while studying law in the UK, noticed homeopathy was “safe, cheap and effective” and brought it back for the masses in India.
Wide range Homeopaths treat a veritable array of problems.
These include allergies, anorectal disorders, asthma, arthritis, back pain, neuralgia, colic, coughs and colds, cystitis, depression, eczema, gynaecological problems, hair loss, heartburn, hyper-pigmentation, insect bites, insomnia, irritable bowel syndrome, leg cramp, menopausal problems, migraines, morning sickness, nausea, obesity, phobias, pre-menstrual syndrome, sexual disorders, stress, teething pains, tumours and warts.
Most homeopaths regularly treat chronic or recurrent conditions such as eczema, rheumatoid arthritis, fatigue disorders, asthma, migraine, dysmenorrhoea, irritable bowel syndrome, recurrent upper respiratory or urinary tract infections and mood disorders. Patients with ill-defined illness that defy conventional diagnosis are also treated.
Significantly, homeopaths treat children more often than other complementary practitioners.
Homeopathy is most popular in the UK, where the Royal Family has had homeopathic physicians since the 1830s.
In England, as many as 45 per cent of conventional doctors (MDs) refer patients to homeopaths.
The treatment is part of the National Health Scheme (NHS).
This is of course, highly unscientific and anecdotal in nature.
But the Queen Mother lived to 100 and wherever she went, she took her homeopathy kit.
And she walked upright although she had arthritis.
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
The Placebo Effect: It Works Because You Say So
You go to a doctor. The doctor gives you a pill. You get better. Then you find out the doctor gave you a sugar pill and you got better anyway. There are two reasons this can happen. The first is because you might have gotten better without bothering to go to the doctor at all. The second is called the Placebo Effect. Many scientists believe it is what makes homeopathy and herbal cures work, and it has some folks in the UK pretty ticked off.
On January 30, a group called 10:23 is organizing an event to protest an English drug store chain's decision to sell homeopathic remedies. Boing Boing carried the story that 300 unbelievers across the UK are each planning to swallow an entire bottle of homeopathic pills. It's a mass "overdose" intended to show that homeopathic remedies are nothing but sugar pills and fake medicine. The event should be interesting, particularly if any of the protesters go into a sugar-induced coma.
Homeopathy is based on three central ideas: First, the Law of Similars: whatever causes your symptoms can also cure them. If you can't sleep, try caffeine. Second, the Law of Infinitesimals. When you dilute a cure in water, it gets stronger. Third, the Law of Succussion, which states that each time you dilute your cure in water you are to tap the bottle to "potentize" it. Homeopaths believe this allows the water to retain the memory or vibration of the cure.
If you believe in homeopathy, this information is unbearably exciting. If you don't, it sounds like superstition and "magik" from 1796, which is when homeopathy was invented by one Samuel Hahnemann.
But what if it's not about what's in the pills at all? What if their potency is predicated upon the intent of the user, the mystique surrounding the pills, or the package they came in? In 1955, an anesthesiologist named Henry Knowles Beecher said that a drug or doctor's success is due to the patient's expectation of a desired outcome. His research suggested that more than 30 percent of the time, patients felt better when they believed the treatment was going to make them feel better. Subsequent researchers say Beecher's research was flawed, but there's no denying that when people in white coats and medical degrees on the wall say reassuring words, people feel better. It also works when the people are wearing feathers and a loin cloth if that's the cultural norm of what a healer looks like.
Expectations are powerful: Reference a puzzling study from the 1920s. A research team wanted to know if making factory lighting brighter would improve worker productivity. It did. But then worker productivity also improved when researchers made the lighting dimmer. The secret? The workers came to expect that any change would make them more productive, no matter whether they could see or were working in the dark.
We're still in the dark regarding the Placebo Effect. It might prove to be the real mechanism for understanding healing energy based on intention and belief. It might be a vestige of old superstitions and "magik." It certainly reveals a lot about how people heal.